Test Management v3.0 Free Sample Questions

The seniority of the stakeholder who suggested the improvement.

The technical complexity of implementing the improvement action.

Alignment with the test team's preferred tools and technologies.

The expected return on investment (ROI) and alignment with project strategies.

Improve the quality of the payment processing module by finding as many defects as possible.

Execute 100% of all planned test cases for the user registration and login functionality by the end of the project.

Achieve 95% execution pass rate for all P1 and P2 priority test cases related to the checkout workflow within Sprint 4, with no outstanding critical defects.

Ensure the application performance is satisfactory for end-users before the final release date.

A reactive approach, focusing on exploratory testing sessions by domain experts to find usability issues late in the cycle.

A regression-averse approach, heavily automating all existing functional tests to ensure no new defects are introduced in core features.

An analytical, standards-based approach, integrating static analysis for security vulnerabilities in the code and dynamic accessibility testing using specialized tools and checklists.

A model-based approach, using state-transition diagrams to generate test cases that maximize functional path coverage of the citizen workflows.

Planning extensive usability testing sessions with end-users on the new CRM interface.

Defining a test approach that includes data validation tests at each stage of the ETL process, using reconciliation reports and data profiling tools.

Organizing performance testing to ensure the new cloud CRM can handle peak user load.

Establishing strict entry/exit criteria for the migration test cycles based on data quality metrics, such as percentage of records successfully migrated and validated.

Implementing a new defect management tool to better track UI-related bugs.

Procure a new, more advanced defect management tool with more mandatory fields.

Implement a mandatory peer-review process for all new defect reports before they are assigned to developers.

Increase the severity level of all defects to get faster attention from the development team.

Schedule more frequent defect triage meetings with the entire project team.

Code coverage percentage achieved by automated unit tests.

A detailed breakdown of defect density per software module.

The percentage of identified high-impact business risks that have been mitigated, with a summary of any remaining residual risks.

The total number of test cases executed versus the number of test cases passed.

Metrics-based estimation using function point analysis.

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) combined with three-point estimation.

Wideband Delphi.

Analogy-based estimation.

Hiring an additional test automation engineer to speed up regression testing.

Implementing daily stand-up meetings and creating a shared knowledge base (e.g., a wiki).

Sending all testers to an advanced certification course to improve their individual skills.

Defining stricter, more granular tasks for each tester to ensure all work is covered.

Average Appraisal Costs - Average Internal Failure Costs

Average External Failure Costs - (Average Appraisal Costs + Average Internal Failure Costs)

Total Project Cost / Total Defects Found

Average Defect Prevention Costs + Average Appraisal Costs

True

False