1/50 questions · Unlock full access
Q1

**Case Study** Global Logistics Inc. (GLI) is centralizing its talent data using Oracle Profile Management. They have a critical need to maintain a skills inventory that is both structured and allows for employee contributions. Their current system is a mix of outdated databases and spreadsheets, leading to inconsistent and unreliable skills data. The project has two main requirements. First, HR must define a master list of 'Core Technical Skills' (e.g., 'SQL', 'Python', 'Project Management') that can be rated on a corporate-standard 4-point proficiency scale. This data must be reportable across the entire organization. Second, employees must be able to add 'Niche Skills' (e.g., 'Fluent in Klingon', 'Advanced Drone Piloting') to their own profiles, which may not be on the master list. These niche skills do not need to be rated on the corporate scale but should be searchable. An implementation consultant needs to design the Profile Management configuration to support both requirements. Which configuration provides the most effective solution? ```mermaid graph TD subgraph Profile_Config [Profile Configuration] subgraph Core_Skills [Core Technical Skills Section] direction LR A[Content Type: 'Core Skills'] --> B[Rating Model: '4-Point Proficiency'] A --> C{Content Items: SQL, Python, ...} C --> D[Managed by HR] end subgraph Niche_Skills [Niche Skills Section] direction LR E[Content Type: 'Niche Skills'] --> F[Free-Form Content Type] F --> G[No Rating Model Attached] E --> H{Employee-Managed} end end ```