GMAT-SECTION-3 Free Sample Questions

A marketing director at a national beverage company is analyzing a recent campaign for a new energy drink, 'Volt-Up'. The campaign, which ran for three months, involved extensive social media advertising and in-store promotions. Post-campaign sales data shows a 15% increase in overall sales for the company's beverage portfolio, but sales for Volt-Up specifically were 20% below projections. The director concluded that the social media component of the campaign was ineffective at targeting the correct audience for the new product. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the marketing director's conclusion?

In response to a decline in local newspaper readership, the city of Oakhaven launched a program offering all residents a free digital subscription to the 'Oakhaven Gazette'. The program's architects reasoned that removing the cost barrier would lead to a significant increase in readership, thereby creating a more informed citizenry. However, two years after the program's implementation, a survey revealed that the proportion of Oakhaven residents who regularly read local news has not changed. Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?

A business analyst argued that for a software company to succeed, it must invest heavily in marketing its flagship product, as a strong market presence is the primary driver of sales. The analyst pointed to the case of TechCorp, which doubled its marketing budget last year and saw a 50% increase in sales of its main software suite. The analyst's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. The advent of blockchain technology has been widely hailed as a revolution for supply chain management. Proponents argue that its core features—decentralization, immutability, and transparency—can solve longstanding issues of trust and inefficiency. A traditional supply chain operates as a series of disparate silos: manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, and retailers each maintain their own records. This fragmentation leads to information delays, disputes over transactions, and a lack of end-to-end visibility, making it difficult to trace products back to their source, a critical function in recalls or authenticity verification. A blockchain-based system, by contrast, creates a shared, distributed ledger. Every transaction, from the procurement of raw materials to the final sale, is recorded as a 'block' and added to the 'chain'. Each block is cryptographically linked to the previous one, and this ledger is duplicated and spread across a network of computers. This structure means that records cannot be altered retroactively without the alteration of all subsequent blocks and the consensus of the network, creating an immutable and highly secure audit trail. For instance, a luxury handbag could have its entire journey tracked, assuring a buyer of its authenticity. A batch of produce could be traced back to its originating farm in seconds, dramatically improving food safety. However, the path to widespread adoption is fraught with challenges. The most significant barrier is not technological but organizational. Implementing a blockchain requires unprecedented collaboration among all supply chain partners, many of whom are competitors. They must agree on standards for data input, governance protocols, and how the system will be managed and funded. Furthermore, the issue of scalability remains; the processing power required to validate transactions on a large-scale blockchain can be immense, potentially slowing down the very processes it is meant to streamline. Finally, while blockchain ensures the integrity of data once it is on the chain, it cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data at the point of entry. The 'garbage in, garbage out' principle still applies; a fraudulent entry, once on the chain, is immutably fraudulent. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Based on the passage provided in the previous question, which of the following can be inferred about traditional supply chains?

According to the passage provided two questions prior, the 'garbage in, garbage out' principle represents a challenge to blockchain implementation because

The city of Glenwood has experienced a 30% increase in traffic congestion over the last five years. To combat this, the city council proposes to fund the construction of a new light rail system. The proposal assumes that a significant number of commuters will switch from driving their cars to using the light rail, thus reducing the number of cars on the road. Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the likelihood that the city council's proposal will achieve its goal?

To improve employee productivity, a company introduced a 'focus time' policy, prohibiting all internal meetings on Wednesdays. The CEO claims the policy is a success, citing a 10% increase in the number of project tasks completed per week since the policy was enacted. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the CEO's claim?

Read the passage and answer the questions that follow. In the annals of economic history, few events are as illustrative of the psychology of speculative bubbles as the Dutch Tulip Mania of the 1630s. During this period, the prices for bulbs of recently introduced and fashionable tulips reached extraordinarily high levels, only to collapse dramatically in a short time. At the peak of the market, a single bulb of a rare variety could allegedly be traded for the price of a grand Amsterdam house. While historical accounts have often been sensationalized, the core event offers a timeless lesson in market dynamics. The mania was not rooted in the intrinsic value of the tulips themselves but in the widespread belief that their prices would continue to rise indefinitely. This belief created a self-fulfilling prophecy, as speculators entered the market not to cultivate the flowers, but to profit from the escalating prices. A key feature of this period was the development of a formal futures market, where contracts to buy bulbs at the end of the season were traded. This allowed for speculation on a grander scale, detached from the physical bulbs, and attracted a broader class of merchants and tradesmen into the frenzy. Modern economic analysis of Tulip Mania, however, has tempered some of the more lurid tales. Scholars like Peter Garber argue that the dramatic price movements were not entirely irrational. They point out that the most extreme prices were for exceptionally rare bulbs, which, like rare works of art, could command high prices from a few wealthy collectors. Furthermore, Garber suggests that the 'collapse' was less a cataclysmic pop and more an orderly unwinding of the futures market after it became clear that the supply of new, desirable tulip varieties would eventually increase, thereby reducing their scarcity and, consequently, their price. This revisionist view posits that the Tulip Mania, rather than being a case of mass insanity, was a rational market response to the introduction of a new and desirable commodity under conditions of great uncertainty about future supply and demand. Nevertheless, the classic interpretation of Tulip Mania as a cautionary tale persists because it so perfectly captures the elements of a speculative bubble: a rapid escalation of asset prices based on an untenable belief in future price gains, followed by a swift collapse. Whether driven by irrational exuberance or rational calculation under uncertainty, the event underscores the inherent instability of markets dominated by speculative motives over fundamental value. The author's primary purpose in the passage is to

According to the passage provided in the previous question, the 'revisionist view' of the Tulip Mania suggests that the high prices of some tulip bulbs were