Lsat Section 1 Logical Reasoning Free Sample Questions

20 free sample questions240 in the full practice test

Try simulator

LSAT-LR Sample Questions

  1. Question 1

    Art Critic: The recent surge in popularity of minimalist digital art is driven not by genuine aesthetic appreciation, but by the speculative frenzy in the market for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The valuation of these pieces has no connection to their artistic merit, which is often negligible. Therefore, this art trend is a bubble destined to burst, leaving many collectors with worthless assets.

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B

    The critic's conclusion that the trend is a 'bubble destined to burst' depends on the unstated assumption that trends based on speculation instead of merit are inherently unsustainable. The critic connects speculative frenzy to a future collapse, and this option provides that necessary link. Without this assumption, the popularity could simply continue regardless of its driver.

  2. Question 2

    A city implemented a 'congestion pricing' policy, charging vehicles a fee to enter the downtown core during business hours. A year later, traffic congestion in the downtown core had decreased by 15%, and air quality had improved by 10%. However, residents of neighborhoods just outside the downtown core reported a significant increase in traffic and a shortage of street parking. This shows that the congestion pricing policy was a failure.

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A

    The argument concludes the policy is a 'failure' based solely on its negative effects on adjacent neighborhoods. This reasoning is flawed because it ignores the policy's stated successes (reduced downtown congestion, improved air quality) and judges it against a criterion (preventing negative impact on surrounding areas) that may not have been its primary goal. A policy can be successful in its main objectives even if it has unintended side effects.

  3. Question 3

    Multiple answers

    A new smart-thermostat, the 'EcoTemp 5000', is advertised as saving homeowners up to 20% on their heating bills. The device uses machine learning to adapt to a household's schedule and preferences, optimizing when the furnace runs. To justify its high price, the manufacturer claims the EcoTemp 5000 will pay for itself in energy savings within two years.

    Which of the following findings would most weaken the manufacturer's claim? (Select TWO)

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answers: A, C

    This weakens the claim by suggesting the advertised savings are based on an unrepresentative sample. If average homes have better insulation, their potential savings will be much lower, extending the time it takes for the device to pay for itself.

    This attacks the core of the payback claim. If a large part of the bill is fixed, even a 20% reduction in the consumption part of the bill will result in a much smaller percentage reduction on the total bill, thus making the two-year payback period less likely.

  4. Question 4

    If a government wishes to reduce nationwide sugar consumption, it must either subsidize healthy food alternatives or tax sugary drinks. However, subsidizing healthy food is prohibitively expensive. Therefore, the government must tax sugary drinks if it wants to reduce sugar consumption.

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B

    The original argument presents a false dichotomy (A or B must happen), eliminates one option (not A), and concludes the other must happen (therefore B). The flaw is that 'subsidize' and 'tax' might not be the only two options. This answer choice perfectly mirrors that flawed structure: it presents a potentially false dichotomy (innovate or expand), eliminates one option due to cost, and concludes the other is necessary.

  5. Question 5

    It is a known fact that regular exercise improves cardiovascular health. It is also well-established that good cardiovascular health is strongly correlated with a longer lifespan. Therefore, anyone who exercises regularly will live longer than they would have if they had not exercised.

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B

    The conclusion is not necessarily true. The argument shifts from a general correlation (good cardiovascular health is correlated with longer lifespan) to a definitive individual outcome. An individual who exercises regularly could have their life cut short by an accident or a non-cardiovascular disease. The premises only support a probabilistic claim (they are more likely to live longer), not a certain one.

  6. Question 6

    In the nation of Ostrania, the birth rate has been declining for a decade. At the same time, life expectancy has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the average age of the Ostranian population is rising. To counteract this trend, the Ostranian government has offered generous financial incentives for couples to have more children. Despite these incentives being in place for five years, the average age of the population has continued to increase.

    Which of the following, if true, does the most to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B

    The discrepancy is that the policy intended to lower the average age failed. This option resolves it by showing that two opposing forces are at play. The policy (increasing births) may have had a small effect in one direction, but another, more powerful factor (dramatically increasing life expectancy) overwhelmed it, leading to the net result of a continued rise in average age.

  7. Question 7

    Policy Analyst: For our city to thrive, we must attract more high-tech companies. These companies bring high-paying jobs, which in turn boosts the local economy. A recent survey shows that a key factor for these companies when relocating is the availability of a highly educated workforce. Therefore, the most effective way for our city to attract high-tech companies is to invest heavily in our local universities.

    Which of the following principles, if valid, would most support the policy analyst's argument?

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C

    The argument identifies a desired outcome (attracting tech companies) and a prerequisite for it (an educated workforce). It then concludes the city should invest in the institution that produces the prerequisite (universities). This principle provides the general rule that connects the evidence (the prerequisite) to the conclusion (the investment).

  8. Question 8

    Interviewer: We are looking for a candidate who is both highly creative and exceptionally detail-oriented. Maria, your portfolio demonstrates outstanding creativity. However, your resume contains several typographical errors. Therefore, you are not a suitable candidate for this position.

    The interviewer's reasoning is flawed because it:

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C

    The flaw is a form of hasty generalization. The interviewer finds one instance of a lack of attention to detail (typos on a resume) and concludes that Maria is not 'exceptionally detail-oriented' in general. It's possible for a detail-oriented person to make a mistake on one document. The argument treats this one piece of negative evidence as conclusive proof, which is a logical leap.

  9. Question 9

    A new law requires that all new buildings in the city meet a 'Green Star' energy efficiency standard. This standard necessitates the use of advanced, expensive materials and construction techniques. While the long-term goal is to reduce the city's overall energy consumption, an immediate consequence will be a sharp increase in the cost of new housing. Since the city already faces a severe housing affordability crisis, this new law will inevitably harm the city's poorest residents the most.

    The central claim of the argument is that:

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: B

    The argument builds a chain of reasoning: the law requires expensive materials, which increases housing costs, and given the existing affordability crisis, this will harm the poorest residents. The final sentence is the main conclusion that the entire passage is structured to support. The other options are premises or intermediate conclusions used to build up to this final point.

  10. Question 10

    Company policy states that any employee who accesses confidential client data must have both Level-2 security clearance and be working on that client's specific project. Jones is working on the Apex project and has Level-2 security clearance. Therefore, Jones is permitted to access confidential data for the Apex project.

    Which of the following must be true for the conclusion to be properly drawn?

    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: C

    The policy, as stated, presents necessary conditions ('must have both'). The conclusion treats them as sufficient conditions (if you have them, you are permitted). For the conclusion to be valid, this unstated sufficient assumption must be true. The original rule says P -> (A and B). The argument concludes (A and B) -> P. This option explicitly states that the conditions are sufficient, bridging the logical gap perfectly.

    flowchart LR subgraph Policy_Rule [Necessary Conditions] Permission --> L2{Level-2 Clearance} Permission --> Project{On Project} end subgraph Argument_Conclusion [Sufficient Conditions] L2_and_Project{L2 AND On Project} --> Has_Permission[Has Permission] end Gap[Logical Gap] -- Bridges --> Argument_Conclusion Policy_Rule -- Fails to Justify --> Has_Permission

Register free to unlock 10 more sample questions

Lifetime One

Own this practice test forever.

$79.99
$75.99
one-time
  • Full access to 240 questions
  • Study, Timed & Flashcard Modes
  • All past and future versions i
  • Detailed Explanations
  • Study Tracking & Past Attempts
  • Brainy AI Assistant
  • Lifetime updates

Two

Any 2 exams per month.

$20.00/exam
$39.99
/month
  • 2 active exam slots
  • Study, Timed & Flashcard Modes
  • All past and future versions i
  • Detailed Explanations
  • Study Tracking & Past Attempts
  • 1,000 Brainy AI Credits
  • Cancel anytime

Premium Twelve

Any 12 exams over 3 months.

$15.00/exam
$179.99
/3 months
  • 4 active exam slots
  • Study, Timed & Flashcard Modes
  • All past and future versions i
  • Detailed Explanations
  • Study Tracking & Past Attempts
  • 15,000 Brainy AI Credits
  • Dedicated support
  • Friend seat included — full access

Trusted by professionals at

NvidiaSupabaseGitHubOpenAITursoClerkClaude AIAmazon